Heraclitus Proper

Much later, critical the philosophical one recognized that it was treated, in the truth, of aforismos. The aforismtica presentation of the thought of Heraclitus makes of it one of the thinkers daily pay-socrticos of more difficult interpretation. A time that the method to play its ranks to the air of the edge so that each one interprets its aforismos of its inside proper dual reality. Heraclitus can be considered the father of the dialectic. The development of its thought was in dialtico essence. As it places MADJAROF (2010): Heraclitus conceives proper the absolute one as process, as the proper dialectic. The dialectic is: . The exterior Dialectic, one to reason here of for there and it soul of the thing not becoming fluid itself it same itself; B.

Dialectic imanente of the object, placing itself, however, in the contemplation of the citizen; C. Objetividade de Heraclitus, that is, to understand the proper dialectic as principle. (grifo of the author) it does not fit at this moment to esmiuar the thought of Heraclitus and as it comes to influence the construction of the MHD. Engels places, to if relating Heraclitus, who does not have one of its aforismos that it has not incorporated its logical Dialectic. But we have to advance in the line of the time, for return of century XV, I cogitate is born it of Discardings. 2.2MEDITAES METAPHYSICAL OF DISCARDINGS (1596 D.C – 1650 D.C) After all, What I am I? This doubt starts to take off sleep and to feed the dreams of Ren Discardings, for return of 1616 D.C. What he is true for Discardings is what can be conceived ' ' clear and distintamente' ' solely for the reason. Here it is the precursory step for the development of modern science. The citizen that will be defined by the cartesian method is not another seno? citizen of science.

Average Age

This is the true cultural legacy, that involves all manifestation of education and creativity that the Greeks had left in them. As well as it writes Ravaisson, the philosophy gave new sensible of dignity, a step of freedom, the supreme desire to know universal the principles managing of the order of the universe is the same desire of being free, that, in such a way, in the contemplation of this principle, it disconnect the man of the simple arrest of the immediate one, and it of a experience of the freedom in the measure where it obtains to understand the reality, conscientious of its position in the cosmos. History takes a new route. The civilization Roman was to the civilization of the Right. The first populations Romans form constituted of farmers: the life in the field, the work next to the nature, the patience ahead of the climate variations, the humildade ahead of the uncertainties of the harvest, everything this contributed for the formation of a vigorous character, marked for the sobriety, simplicity and persistence. When the Roman cultural development in the intellectual sector was become fullfilled, the Roman man would have of to inform this development in the direction of a speculation that took care of to this spirit of justice and equity: of the conjunction of these two elements appeared this monument of the culture, that is the Roman law.

In the Average Age, per long centuries, it looked for to lead the man for its supernatural destination. A concern with the salvation of the man, this idea defended for the Christianity grew. this made with that the attention of the Christian world if dislocated from the idea of God for the man idea. The principle, the cult of God centered everything, and the salvation of the man would be a consequence. The Renaissance appears, with a new way to think the conditions of the world, leaving stops backwards the medieval aberrations, where the man could not express its creativity for the vingativa censorship of the Church Catholic.

The Man

The man changeds itself, gradually, throughout History and, to the end of centuries lived of some forms, under diverse systems, he today faces a world that evoluciona vertiginously. Some basic values that to the man say respect while person of rights and duties are not irremediably lost but before, prejudicedly, forgotten. The reflection capacity can develop in nostalgia or projecto. The thought alone valley in the measure where the application it continues it to material, what it means that some questions if place, which are: where measure, reflection and share if pursue, if they condition, if they correct and if they interdict? Or still, where measured, revolution and culture if can articulate, that is, it will have the revolution of the culture or the culture of the revolution? Many and diverse can be the interrogations; answers for all, nor always are found by the man and, when they are, they show, later, not to serve the objectivos that, proper they, would intend to reach. Being the culture a basic condition for the understanding of the realities that involve the man, the social dimension of this constitutes one another aspect essential in the formation of the citizen of the future, considering since as soon as the man has absolute necessity to establish communication with others its fellow creatures, to transmit experiences to them and to receive information, at last, to become involved itself existentially. The sociability of the man is a trend it to live with the others, to partilhar with others the emotions, feelings and also to argue the power, to establish the norms, to apply the sanctions, punishing or premiando. The Man interacts with its fellow creatures, but also he becomes related with other animals, other species, at last, with the proper nature of that it is interested person, because he always goes depending on this same nature. The sociability, that estimates interaco, implies the creation and responsible functioning of mechanisms and more or less steady institutions, associations that promote the social dynamism in the direction of organized convivncia e, maioritariamente, reliable of the rules politically established.

The Act

After the sprouting of education, diverse technologies had in the distance been inserted, that they had come to contribute for the definition of basic supports. As initial proposals books and cartilhas had been written; the television and the radio had constituted the supports of the Seventies; audio and the videos in the Eighties; the nets of satellite, the e-mail, the Internet and the programs especially elaborated appear in the decade of ninety. We can perceive that the current development of the technology favors the creation and the enrichment of the long-distance education, therefore allows to approach in efficient way innumerable subjects, as well as favoring the approach between professors and pupils and of these between itself. The use of the technology comes in the distance to decide one of the great problems of education the interatividade. Innumerable options had been developed that the users allow to carry through consultations, to interchange opinions, problems or proposals with other users. The constant access allows that the pupils learn to use programs that bring up to date the information constantly. When using the technology as tool will go to notice that its use also modifies the way to decide new problems or other tasks and to relate referring hypotheses and 0 variable to discipline boarded.

The writing modified the way to think and to operate and the modern technologies they had also produced change in relation to a new structure of the act to think. It is a new tool that stimulates the recognition of different proposals that take the construction of the knowledge. The adaptation of if the human one with the variety of technological resources result in the capacity of to recognize and for in action new cognitivas activities, therefore the technological development generates possibilities with new relations of the knowledge with the cultural contexts. Although to affirm that the technology can decide many situations in relation to the knowledge, in the measure where it represents powerful tool in the solution of activities, it does not want to say that they decide the understanding problems.


Search this that is not placed in the relation of having and yes of the being, therefore, not wanting to invest of the European roupagem, finishes as the man mixes being at the same time what attentive to defend and what renega. Somebody that, second (FERRAZ 2002, P. 1004); ' ' Total unprovided of it identifies what it properly, needs, according to Nietzsche, of fancies of multiple disguises to occult its feira how much to aplacar its desperation, its proper 11 absence of ' ' prprios' ' ' ' thus reflecting the Macunama in the attempt to know all of culture to know itself exactly thus constructing to its &#039 to it; ' prprio' '. Therefore what in Nietzsche if it presents as caricature, exaggerating what already it exists, in the case? European culture? , in Macunama if it presents for parody for exaggerating a culture supposedly Brazilian, however derived from the Europe, in the intention to project the proposal, possible to exist? the Brazilian culture? Leaving then of the understanding of that the parody if presents as one of the constituent elements of the text in Macunama she is necessary finds it. Task not very difficult if to take as control point one of its characteristics more perceivable as, second (HUTCHEON 1985, P.

48) ' ' transconstextualizao and inversion, repetition with difference' ' what it can more easily be understood as the use of one determined text for another author who of it if possesses differentiated it he rewrites it. It is clearly that the terms transcontetualizao and inversion deepen more the understanding of the parody, but to this if it will return more ahead, for the moment is enough what it can semantically happen of these two terms; repetition and difference. One is overcome for example the first paragraph of Macunama, (ANDRADE 2000, P. 13) ' ' In the deep one of the virgin weeds was born Macunama' ' overlapping it parallel to the text of Iracema, Alencar ' ' In the way of the virgin bush was born Iracema' ' the same phrase repeated with the difference marked in the two terms, that if present as a followed common substantive of an adjective.