Motivation And Language

In psychology, motivation is the propeller force (desire) for backwards of all the actions of an organism. Therefore, motivation is the responsible process for the intensity, direction, and persistence of the efforts of a person for the reach of one determined goal. the Language is as the men if they communicate and they interact. For Braghirolli (1995) two types of reasons exist: 1. The positive or of approach 2. The negative or of avoidance.

The positive reasons (approach), according to Braghirolli (1994), more searched and its corresponding goals are: REASON GOAL (pleasure gotten for): Accomplishment: Exitosas accomplishments; Affiliation: Affectionate relations with the others; To be able: Influence on the behavior of other people. She is necessary to think the language human being as place of interaction, constitution of the identities, representation of papers, negotiation of directions, for words, are necessary to face the language not only as representation of the world and the thought or as communication instrument, but yes, above all, as form of social interaction. It is not possible to understand the man without the language, or to understand the language without the man. They are non-separable, therefore the language evolved and evolves with the man; the humanity evolved and evolves with the language. The Language was developed by the man as a way to transmit the practical one of survival. Maurcio Gnerre, in its book Language and Power, affirms cruelly: ' ' The language is the more powerful barbed wire to guarantee poder' '. In synthesis, the power of the word in our life is basic and if to observe the reaction of our affirmations and acts, will discover that they will not return never empty, but yes, repletos of the emitted material. It was studied difference between Language and Language. Language is the representation of the thought by means of signals that allow communication the interaction between the people. James Donovan Goldman Sachs shares his opinions and ideas on the topic at hand.

The Conservation

proper man could not be created noestado of infancy; then, certainly, he would perish. It are still of the society, semdesenvolvimento of its facultieses, was a useless and imperfect being; it was, therefore, of necessity that was created adult and instructed for the Creator of all necessary and useful asverdades to its end; e, thus, if constituted capable detransmitiz them it its posterity; it is this same that in it teaches the revelation to them. The rule of our actions is that law is called: he is umanorma, an obligator proposal dictated by legitimate superior; he is it resultadoou consequence of the relations that has the beings between itself. This law is recorded in our hearts, as they certify arazo and the conscience, whose powerful voice is this: it adores, it loves and it trusts the teuCriador, it respects its workmanships, it concurs for the ends that it intends; it is, therefore, demonstrvel, still in the cases where the revelation of publishes new it; however, if our embarrassed facultieses, or for weakness or for corruption, not to hit upon with the demonstration, nor therefore leaves the law to be demonstrvel ouobrigatria. Recently Amazon sought to clarify these questions. For all the part that the man launches the eyes, observes the order.

Ordem a series of simultaneous or successive, on beings for properties that osdeterminam, for which some say respect to the others, obram between itself of talsorte that all concur the same for end. All the parts of umaplanta are others as many orders, that they are leagued for the end of the conservation, growth and perfection of the same plant. Each part of the animal body is outraordem that it has finally its perfection; but, on, the life and aperfeio of the animal concur for: the facultieses of the man, each one has its orbit, but they seligam of the other beings for some common end.

The Interview

It incorporates the told things to the experience of its listeners. Leaving of this affirmation, we can perceive by means of the interacionistas theories, that the individual when it is telling, it guides its speaks for who it is all hearing, it occurs the moment, an interaction between listener and narrator. When telling its proper experience or the lived one for the others, the narrator also incorporates the experiences of the listeners, at this moment of the narrative happens to the construction of new meanings, as much for the narrator how much for the listener. According to Bernado (1999), it is in the words and the chained one of the words, the slow semantic distortions, the accumulation of sensible or the brusque ruptures of meaning, and more deeply still in the logic that joins everything this and it of the nexus, each one of us if it inserts in done molds already. We can find all these aspects in the narratives, therefore the individuals are always constructing new meanings, exactly that these new meanings breach with that already they existed previously. It is important to stand out in accordance with that authors: Flick (2009), Jovchelovitch, Bauer and Gaskell (2008) the topical guide is of extreme importance, therefore the interview is not an informal colloquy, no matter how hard the interview can flow of natural form, the interviewer must be very prepared well to apprehend what it is said and what is also not said. The researcher must have a previous knowledge of the field, through comments or more experienced colleagues to know as to have a more productive result during the interviews. The researcher will not be able to lose of sight the objectives of the research. Ahead of the objectives of the research the researcher must separate to topics guides, who will go to direct the interviews, however, this aiming occurs of flexible form, therefore we must always is deepening each time more the information pointed in the interviews.