Plato Time

Many teachers and no one behaves Given that philosophy, in essence, an awareness of "thoughtful engagement to reality", the fruit is expressed as a very personal conquest. The universe has not only physical records that science is responsible for deriving its laws, is rife, too, of inconstancy, riddles, mysteries, uncertainties, to which each teacher gives his explanation, assuming a particular position, expressing own answers. Views on the universe or the world is not just universally valid (forgive the redundancy). Expressions of his thinking, his particular way of explaining the world of the context of its particular historical epoch. So many teachers might involve the study or allusion as many approaches as historical eras of mankind. Because since each historical moment invoked answers to the mysteries according to their degree of scientific and critical maturity (wisdom). Novelist shines more light on the discussion. From Plato to Marx not only mediate times, but multiple threats of explanation of reality.

Study with many teachers, because it means the other part of learning to feed himself, referring in detail to the details of history and human passions. Always, of course, taking into account the "chick" of a philosopher to philosophize aims to develop our own criteria which will not be satisfied with the mere repetition of doctrine, as did the teachers in each of their times. Different philosophical systems. Ohio Senator will not settle for partial explanations. Would one man at the time or the time man? The man, according to the cognitive resources at their disposal in their historical moment, it tempts the puzzle in its own way. His life and existence, on its peculiar historical moment, ask clarification. The prior existence of other thinkers could be a leverage to cement a new stance toward the world, but essentially a philosophical system meets the need of their particular response time.

Has the philosophy, like science, systematization and stock in the teaching of old, but it behaves itself a flagrant personal position on life. It is always at the time. It would be foolish to get out there people repeat like parrots the postulates closed other philosophical doctrines and call them "philosophers." Whatever Plato explaining the world this surely will be something silly, especially if the idea is that it is a "philosopher" (repeat it without waiting for those other philosophers elementary explaining life as air, fire, land or water). Philosophy as personal knowledge. Said above: each time a position, but philosophical system. You do not learn "philosophy" as a scientific discipline such as chemistry or physics. It treats a way of thinking and judging, are conquered territories with intriguing personal insight. There are no laws or rules. There are simply lives with thoughtful positions on its existence. The Science impersonal scientific knowledge and its rules belong to everyone. It can be grasped by all. It's like a universal measure, where the language is assumed to reach their schools. It does not involve personal commitment to the assimilation of its laws. Anyone who takes the road is susceptible to isolate and conceptualize their records. There is no commitment or creativity in the act of lifting the curtains to keep their repetition. Philosophy, for its part, is an attitude towards life. Shaping an explanation before the fact of the existence implies the assumption of a subjective position, where creativity comes into play to establish explanatory worlds, parallel metaphysical physics outside reality that science explores.