But the focus main, in accordance with Koga (2002) is in the formularization and implementation of decentralizing public politics that consider the local citizens, that is, that it has taken in account the particularitity of each place; its culture, economy, history and social context. Being thus, in the conception of Nakano (2010) it has that if to try to change them in landmarks of an ample social project and politician, being promoted a structural reconfiguration of its territories integrating them it all the spheres. Of this form, the citizenship constitutes a democratic conquest, allowing to the construction of cities more jousts, however, so that the real social transformations can happen, is required ruptures and implementation of new politics, process that if initiate for the way of ample social mobilizations and for an active and continuum presence of the collective representations of the citizenship in the public spaces, pressuring directly the governments and acting in the participation mechanisms, for then going route to a new order, as considered for the professional ethical project (NETTO, 2004). 3. Consideraes final As if searched to stand out by means of this text, the Urban Politics is an important mechanism in the efetivao of rights, having as reference the Federal Constitution of 1988, and appearing as an effort of the State in bringing a satisfactory reply, front to the occured urban changes in result of the increasing migration. Into this direction, it is become into a state instrument, also representing, however, the reaction of this before the demands and pressures of the society. E, therefore, evidences that, the public politics synthecizes contrary interests that act dialeticamente. To approach the related Urban Politics to the Right to the city is, in first place, to rethink the social paper of the citizen and its relation with the space where it inhabits, and, in this perspective, to go beyond its reproductive paper while of the capital.